PCIMS | Pager | E-mail | Library | Mednet | Med Center Policies | Credentials Verification | New Hospital David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Graduate Medical Education

Prospective Residents/Fellows Welcome Message Our Programs Housing Office International Medical Graduates Life in LA Recreation Center Resident Contract Salaries & Benefits Current Residents/Fellows Resources ACGME Competencies Certification & Licensure Chief Residents Help Lines HIPAA House Staff Manual Life in LA Our Programs Resident Committees Resident Contract Residents' Homepages Resident Orientation Resident Resources & Websites Resident Surveys Resident as Teacher Salaries & Benefits Townhall Meetings with DIO Verinform Program Director/Faculty Resources ACGME Certification & Licensure Conferences General Resources GME e-bulletin Help Lines House Staff Manual Internal Program Review International Medical Graduates Life Curriculum New PD Appointments Policies Program Letter of Agreement Rotator Guidelines Tools Verinform Program Coordinator Resources Help Lines International Medical Graduates Program Letter of Agreement Preparing for RRC Site Visit Preparing for an Internal Review Recruitment/Interviews Rotator Guidelines Self-reflection Tool What to put in a Resident file Credentials Verification About Us GME Office GME Committee Mission Statement Program Directors Program Coordinators Annual Report Policies Administrative Resident Home   Policy - Disruptive Physician Disruptive Behavior Purpose Policy Procedure Confidential Report Follow-up PROCEDURE Complaints about a member of the house staff regarding alleged disruptive behavior must be in writing, signed, and directed to the trainee’s Program Director (see Attachment A). 1. Level I: the Program Director or their designee, with the advice of legal counsel interviews the complainant and, if possible, any witnesses within one working day of receiving the complaint and interviews the house staff member within one working day of receiving the complaint. He/she provides the trainee the opportunity to respond in writing. The Program Director, Department Chair or their designee does one or more of the following: determines that no action is warranted issues a warning requires a written apology to the complainant refers member to the Medical Staff Health Committee initiates corrective action pursuant to the Housel Staff Policies and Procedures. 2. Level II: the Program Director, Department Chair or designee interviews the complainant and, if possible, any witnesses within 5 working days of receiving the complaint and interviews the house staff member within 5 working days. He/she provides the member the opportunity to respond in writing. The Program Director, Department Chair or designee may: determine that no action is warranted. issue a warning require a written apology to the complainant refer member to the Medical Staff Health Committee initiate corrective action pursuant to the Medical Staff Bylaws 3. Level III: the Program Director, Department Chair or designee interviews the complainant and, if possible, any witnesses within 10 working days of receiving the complaint. He/she provides the member the opportunity to respond in writing. The Program Director, Department Chair or designee may: determine that no action is warranted. issue a warning require a written apology to the complainant refer member to the Medical Staff Health Committee initiate corrective action pursuant to the Medical Staff Bylaws. Return to GME Policies